<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beowulf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dionattheflicks.com/2007/11/30/beowulf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dionattheflicks.com/2007/11/30/beowulf/</link>
	<description>The cyber-popcorn is real but the butter is fake</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion</title>
		<link>http://dionattheflicks.com/2007/11/30/beowulf/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 01:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionattheflicks.com/2007/11/30/beowulf/#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankly, I&#039;ve wondered the same thing regarding motion-capture technology -- it strikes me as reinventing the wheel, unless you want to realise something like Gollum onscreen.

I can only come up with two reasons: 1) it allows greater interaction between the characters and an all-CG environment and 2) it allows for real 3D in a fantasy setting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I&#8217;ve wondered the same thing regarding motion-capture technology &#8212; it strikes me as reinventing the wheel, unless you want to realise something like Gollum onscreen.</p>
<p>I can only come up with two reasons: 1) it allows greater interaction between the characters and an all-CG environment and 2) it allows for real 3D in a fantasy setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Olsen</title>
		<link>http://dionattheflicks.com/2007/11/30/beowulf/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Olsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionattheflicks.com/2007/11/30/beowulf/#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having not seen Beowulf I cannot comment on the movie itself. But, I forsaw this day coming, when people would try to replace actors with CG. I must admit that I don&#039;t completely grasp the vision.

In &quot;Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow&quot; we&#039;re introduced to CG everything . . . except the actors. And though cartoons (including CG) will always be enjoyed, what&#039;s the point of replacing humans with 2D images? This is especially true when humans are the ones actually delivering the performance. Go ahead and add all the special effects you want to make your battle scenes juicy, just don&#039;t replace their eyes!

&quot;A Skanner Darkly&quot; made sense because the digital elements fit the feel and tone of the film. It was an artistic choice to enhance the impact of the medium. But &quot;Beowulf&quot; is striving for reality when they already have real people standing in front of the camera giving an amazing performance. 

I hope actors won&#039;t ever be completely replaced by digital thespians. Thankfully, unless an artifical intelligence is spawned who&#039;s sole goal isn&#039;t the destruction of mankind, but merely to win a Oscar . . . we can always be sure there will be a man behind the curtain. And that&#039;s a comforting thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having not seen Beowulf I cannot comment on the movie itself. But, I forsaw this day coming, when people would try to replace actors with CG. I must admit that I don&#8217;t completely grasp the vision.</p>
<p>In &#8220;Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow&#8221; we&#8217;re introduced to CG everything . . . except the actors. And though cartoons (including CG) will always be enjoyed, what&#8217;s the point of replacing humans with 2D images? This is especially true when humans are the ones actually delivering the performance. Go ahead and add all the special effects you want to make your battle scenes juicy, just don&#8217;t replace their eyes!</p>
<p>&#8220;A Skanner Darkly&#8221; made sense because the digital elements fit the feel and tone of the film. It was an artistic choice to enhance the impact of the medium. But &#8220;Beowulf&#8221; is striving for reality when they already have real people standing in front of the camera giving an amazing performance. </p>
<p>I hope actors won&#8217;t ever be completely replaced by digital thespians. Thankfully, unless an artifical intelligence is spawned who&#8217;s sole goal isn&#8217;t the destruction of mankind, but merely to win a Oscar . . . we can always be sure there will be a man behind the curtain. And that&#8217;s a comforting thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

